Every LinkedIn ad format, explained
LinkedIn groups its ad formats into four families by where the ad appears. Lead gen forms are not a format — they are an attachment you can add to several of these.
Sponsored Content — ads in the feed
- Single image ads. One image, headline and copy in the feed. The workhorse: the cheapest to produce, the easiest to test, and the format most demand-capture campaigns run to a lead gen form or a landing page.
- Video ads. Native video in the feed, sound-off by default. Best for showing a product or a person; measured on view rate and completion, not clicks.
- Carousel ads. Two to ten swipeable cards. Works for step-by-step stories and multi-product showcases; underused in B2B because it is fiddly to build.
- Document ads. A PDF that previews in the feed and can be gated behind a lead gen form after the first pages. The strongest format for guides, reports and playbooks.
- Event ads. Promote a LinkedIn Event to drive registrations, with the event details rendered natively.
- Article and newsletter ads. Sponsor a LinkedIn article or newsletter edition to grow subscribers and readership.
- Thought leader ads. Sponsor a post from a person's profile — a founder, an executive, an employee — rather than the company page. Appears as a normal post with "Promoted" beneath. The highest-engagement format on the platform and the core of B2B demand generation.
- Connected TV ads. Video delivered to streaming TV in the US, targeted with LinkedIn's professional data. Awareness only; no click.
Sponsored Messaging — ads in the inbox
- Conversation ads. A message from a named sender with multiple call-to-action buttons that branch into a choose-your-own-path flow. Kiin's default demand-capture format for sales-led B2B — median cost per lead $200 across 242 accounts, and 33% cheaper per lead than single-image lead gen forms in the same account (Kiin Labs 2026); measured on opens and open rate.
- Message ads. A single message with one call to action — the format formerly called Sponsored InMail. Not available to audiences in the EU under GDPR; inside the same account it is a tie with conversation ads on cost per lead (message ads open 20% more, conversation ads complete the form 21% more), so it is a choice by offer rather than a legacy format. The two are compared in conversation ads vs sponsored InMail.
Dynamic Ads — personalised units in the right rail
- Follower ads. Pull the viewer's own name and photo into a small unit inviting them to follow your page.
- Spotlight ads. The same personalised unit pointing to a landing page or an offer.
Text Ads
- Text ads. Small headline-and-description units at the top or right of the desktop feed, priced per click. Cheap, low-attention, and the only format that has looked the same for a decade.
Not a format: lead gen forms
A lead gen form attaches to single image, video, carousel, document, conversation and message ads. It pre-fills from the member's profile, which is why submission friction is near zero — and why form opens are reported far more prominently than submissions. Only submissions are leads.
Which format should B2B use? It depends on the job
Most people asking "what's the best LinkedIn ad format?" are looking for one answer. The reality is that different formats do different jobs, and a proper B2B SaaS campaign uses multiple formats simultaneously — each one optimised for a specific stage of the funnel.
The mistake is choosing one format and running it in isolation. Conversation ads without demand gen are expensive. TL ads without demand capture generate awareness but no meetings. The formats work together. Here's what each one does best.
Every Format, Ranked
The proven combination: 5+ TL ads running simultaneously for demand gen (60% of budget), conversation ads with incentive for demand capture (30%), and lead gen forms with Calendly for frictionless booking (10%). All targeting the same account list. This is the stack that produces SQLs at $59–$165 on retargeting audiences.
Why Most Companies Get This Wrong
The most common mistake is running only one format — usually single image ads from a company page asking cold audiences to "Learn More" or "Request a Demo." This produces mediocre engagement, expensive clicks, and very few conversions.
The second most common mistake is running conversation ads without demand generation. Yes, conversation ads work on cold audiences — but SQLs cost $154–$388 from cold versus $59–$165 from retargeting. Demand gen makes demand capture cheaper. The TL ads create the awareness that makes the conversation ad convert.
Each format has a different success metric. TL ads are measured by penetration rate and frequency, not clicks. Conversation ads are measured by SQL cost and form-to-meeting rate. Lead gen forms are measured by booking rate. Judging TL ads by their CPC or conversation ads by their CTR leads to wrong conclusions about what's working.